What legal scholars are seeing behind the smoke screen is far darker. They say the single most radical thing the court did wasn’t confirming birthright citizenship, but instead it was the dismantling of barriers that had long insulated a broad sector of the federal government from raw presidential control.

What legal scholars are seeing behind the smoke screen is far darker. They say the single most radical thing the court did wasn’t confirming birthright citizenship, but instead it was the dismantling of barriers that had long insulated a broad sector of the federal government from raw presidential control.

What legal scholars are seeing behind the smoke screen is far darker. They say the single most radical thing the court did wasn’t confirming birthright citizenship, but instead it was the dismantling of barriers that had long insulated a broad sector of the federal government from raw presidential control.