Olympia Report: Water, and the Nanny State

-

A family farmโ€™s enduring feud with the state Department of Ecology spilled into Olympia this month where the Supremes may all but rewrite how it polices water rights.

This story begins in January of 2017, when Grant County farmer Ron Fode was vying for a nod from Ecology to irrigate his fields in lieu of owning the groundwater rights to do so. The agency shot down his bid later that February. Undaunted, Fode and his landlord spent the summer floating counterproposals by Ecology, namely working out a series of water rights transfers from neighboring properties. Ecology gave them a thumbs down on the basis that those rights had dried up.

Out in theย Columbia River Basin, potato farmers like Fodeย have to tread a maze of state-issued water rights governed by everything from shifting groundwater levels to federal water deliveries. A host of groundwater rights in these parts fall under the label of โ€œstandbyโ€ or โ€œreserveโ€ rights, which only activate when federal water runs scarce. The dual-source system can leave farmers thinking theyโ€™ve got a green light to irrigate, only to learn that the โ€œstandbyโ€ status of their groundwater right has gone bad should federal water (theoretically) become unavailable for that acreage.

In this case, Fode applied to transfer a reserve water right. Ecology denied it on the basis that he had blown past its internal โ€œoffice deadlineโ€ of Feb. 15 to request one. Fode couched this as a catch-22 where you only learn the rules by breaking them. Ecology has insisted their stated deadline was only one factor in rejecting his request.

Hereโ€™s why you should care about this

The crux of this story rests on what state agencies are bound to do for the taxpayers who fund them. Moreover, it could better define how accessible a public resource ought to be for the public in drought country. Another low-water year could turn this case into a watershed moment for farmers.

By the end of 2017, Ecology fined Fode some $620,000 for allegedly tapping into the Odessa aquifer to (illegally) douse his 400-acre property. The agency cited wet fields and rotating pivots as proof, per court documents. Fode chalked it up as the work of heavy fog or morning dew. The Pollution Control Hearings Board and the state Court of Appeals disagreed, balking at the notion that Ecology needed โ€œmeter-perfectโ€ evidence of every gallon pumped.

Cue the National Federation of Independent Business and the conservative Pacific Legal Foundation, which stood beside Fode in the court. His attorneys allege he was not only issued excessive fines but denied the assistance owed to him. They cited this specific RCW, which reads:

โ€œThe department shall prepare and distribute technical and educational information to the general public to assist the public in complying with the requirements of their water rights and applicable water laws.โ€

The state Court of Appeals nevertheless held that Ecology wasnโ€™t obligated to find water for Fode. Naturally, Fode argued otherwise. Hence his petition to the Supremes.

State agencies have enjoyed broad discretion to edit their rulebooks, particularly since the stateโ€™s high court gave Ecology a hall pass to set CO2 emission standards at its own pace back in 2015.

It remains to be seen if the new faces among the Supremes opt to change course.


A telling bit of satire

By Jonathan Martin

The nanny state in Washington has gone so helicopter mom that itโ€™s no longer legal to cruise, joyride or go โ€œdriving with no place to go,โ€ as of last Friday. Gov. Bob Fergusonโ€™s statement as he signed SB 626 said the absurdly vague restriction โ€œensures our roadways are used responsibly and with purpose.โ€ What are the kids to do in Washingtonโ€ฆ and Ohio, Florida and Kentucky?

Thatโ€™s right, the exact same law was passed in blue and red states alike, according to a fake Facebook post circulating last week. No such law was passed in any of those states. But with its official-looking letterhead from Fergusonโ€™s office and the other states, the satire prompted pro forma outrage comments about government overreach. It did get the state Senateโ€™s bill numbering convention wrong, but you canโ€™t trust AI to get everything right.

Weย arenโ€™t in the habit of re-upping hokum, unless itโ€™s kinda funny and telling, as this bit was. Social media has increasingly become an echo chamber to reinforce pre-existing beliefs. This one went viral enough to prompt a response from Fergusonโ€™s official FB account, which asked for users to report it to FB.

It also prompted a story from The News Tribune and the beloved BS-checkers at Snopes, headquartered in Tacoma. Be careful what you wish for, folks.

This story first appeared in the authorsโ€™ politics newsletter,ย The Washington Observer.


Discover more from Post Alley

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments Policy

Please be respectful. No personal attacks. Your comment should add something to the topic discussion or it will not be published. All comments are reviewed before being published. Comments are the opinions of their contributors and not those of Post alley or its editors.

Popular

Recent