76 F
Seattle
Friday, July 1, 2022

Clamoring For Attention


A quick take on the second 10:

My overriding takeaway tonight is that the NBC interviewers did a terrible job of keeping the discourse orderly and respectful. They need to silence the microphones of the main transgressors butting into others’ time. (Kirsten Gillebrand and Eric Swalwell worst offenders).

Viewers could listen to each candidate’s comments the previous night without their being drowned out by others shouting over them. So much time was lost to the cacophony of interruptions that many of the speakers’  messages were inaudible.

Both of the alleged frontrunners lost some of their edge tonight, IMHO. Bernie Sanders came across as arrogant and dismissive of contrary views. Joe Biden didn’t give a persuasive defense of his positions on race and taxes. Both men were inarticulate. Biden was better on the importance of our alliances and gave one of the better summations. Bernie was forceful on the need to prevent war with Iran.

Kamala Harris had her moments, especially about being a pawn in the busing controversies of the 1960s and 70s. I didn’t hear anything from her on foreign policy. She came across as a little too strident and needed to show more respect for the time’s-up calls.

I had so far dismissed Pete Buttigieg as a shooting star who would flame out, much like Beto has, and thought that was happening after the police shooting last week. But he was probably the most articulate and persuasive on a broad range of issues.

Didn’t see anything from Michael Bennet, John Hickenlooper, Andrew Yang or Marianne Williamson that moved them up the ladder.

Hoping the next debate has fewer than 10 people clamoring for attention.

Image: Wikimedia

Carol J Williams
Carol J Williams
Carol J. Williams is a retired foreign correspondent with 30 years' reporting abroad for the Los Angeles Times and Associated Press. She has reported from more than 80 countries, with a focus on USSR/Russia and Eastern Europe.

Post Alley welcomes comments to our articles. Our guidelines: no personal attacks, stay on topic, add something of value to the discussion. Our editors will edit comments for clarity and to conform with our guidelines. We encourage writers to use their full names.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

LATEST

Time to Lower the Heat in the Post-Roe Commentary

3
If the SCOTUS decision is the beginning, not the end, of the debate, we will need a lot more thoughtful commentary. Here are some examples.

Bolting for the Bigs: USC, UCLA Abandon PAC-12 for Big Ten (UW Next?)

9
It’s official now that the industry has fallen off the edge of the flat Earth propped so long by the mythology of amateurism.

Inside City Hall’s Serious Budget Shortfall

7
The multimillion-dollar gap -- viewed in the perspective of an annual budget in the $7 billion range -- is perhaps not horrific. But it still is bound to impact what the city can achieve towards meeting its on-going needs and ambitious social goals.

Battling Cancer, B.C. Premier Horgan to Step Down

1
Horgan, leader of the New Democratic Party, was a temperamental opposition leader but has proven an avuncular head of government. 

Pot Industry Versus its Workers

2
A new political action committee, People for Legal Cannabis, is gearing up to fight any effort by outsiders such as the UFCW to empower their workers. 

TRENDING

Bolting for the Bigs: USC, UCLA Abandon PAC-12 for Big Ten (UW Next?)

9
It’s official now that the industry has fallen off the edge of the flat Earth propped so long by the mythology of amateurism.

Inside City Hall’s Serious Budget Shortfall

7
The multimillion-dollar gap -- viewed in the perspective of an annual budget in the $7 billion range -- is perhaps not horrific. But it still is bound to impact what the city can achieve towards meeting its on-going needs and ambitious social goals.

Time to Lower the Heat in the Post-Roe Commentary

3
If the SCOTUS decision is the beginning, not the end, of the debate, we will need a lot more thoughtful commentary. Here are some examples.

The Supreme Court: Republican Majorities Since 1970

10
In fact, in every year since 1970, the majority of Supreme Court justices have been Republican appointees. Since the beginning of Chief Justice Warren Burger’s court until the death of Justice Ruth B. Ginsberg, there have been 31 Republican appointed-justices and 8 Democratic appointed-justices sitting on the Supreme Court.The Supreme

Three Reasons Public Confidence in the Supreme Court has Plunged

8
It is hard to like or respect this Court.