41.3 F
Seattle
Sunday, December 15, 2019

10 Hot Takes on the First Democratic Debate Night

Ten hot takes on the first night of the first Democratic debate:

1) Warren dominated the first half of the debate. She had a clear and consistent anti-corporate message that she pounded relentlessly — and the moderators gave her disproportionate time to do it — and none of the others availed themselves of the opportunity to directly challenge her. They seemed more than a little cowed by her strength.

2) I am surprised none of them — particularly Warren — took a shot at Biden, even indirectly. This was a mistake on Warren’s part. The media is hungry to turn this into a two person race — Warren v. Biden, left v. center — and she had a golden opportunity to start to really frame the race that way. She didn’t take it. Big missed opportunity.

3) Of the vaguely plausible candidates, Beto was the biggest loser. I thought he was underwhelming, a generic pretty boy offering forgettable platitudes. Plus, stop it with the Spanish language pandering, compadre. However, a buddy texted me right after the debate ended that the three ladies he watched with were all impressed with Beto, and one of the ladies I was with commented on how tall he was, so there’s that. Life isn’t fair, and neither are campaigns.

4) I thought DeBlasio did better than anyone expected him to do. He certainly beat my expectations. Then again, I started with zero expectations.

5) Booker did okay, but his closing — about his parents overcoming discrimination in seeking the American Dream — should have been his opening. I doubt he did much to move the needle. I still think he should have challenged Warren directly, and created an exchange.

6) Klobuchar delivered a couple of good lines, but overall she came across like she needs a personality transplant. Barring a remarkable medical discovery in the next few months about how to do that, she is not going to be the American president (or the 2020 Democratic nominee).

7) I give Jay Inslee points for FINALLY talking about something besides climate change. Trouble is, he wasn’t as sharp as he should have been in his answers. Worse, his climate change comments didn’t really stand out, and he got his thunder stolen by Beto and Warren on the “biggest geopolitical threat” question, when he named Trump and they named (the right answer) climate change.

8) Warren was not nearly as visible the second half of the debate. You get the sense the hacks from the others campaigns must have been screaming a blue streak at MSNBC staff over the softball questions and air time she was getting in the early going, and as a result Todd and Maddow were told to cool it. Also, she disappeared on foreign policy, which seems to be a weakness for her (Biden campaign take note).

9) I thought it was weird that when Castro picked a fight on immigration, he picked it with Beto. I guess when you’re blind, punching the one-eyed man with a broken leg makes sense. The NYT tells me there’s prior bad blood between the Castro brothers and O’Rourke, so that probably explains it.

10) None of the candidates hit a home run, or even a triple. No truly big, memorable moments. I hate to say it, but I kinda, sorta agree with Trump’s admirably pithy tweet: “BORING!” Bottom line takeaway: tonight was a pretty good night for Warren, cementing her first tier status. Maybe, though, a better night for absent front-runner Joe Biden, who also went unchallenged. After all, when you’re winning, the status quo is good.

Sandeep Kaushik
Sandeep Kaushik is a political and public affairs consultant in Seattle. In a previous life, he was a staff writer and political columnist at the Stranger, and did a stint as a Washington State correspondent for Time Magazine and for the Boston Globe, back in the olden days when such positions still existed.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

LATEST

Now Is the Time to Create a New, Third-Way Party

The battle for the soul of the Republican Party has been lost. The Democratic Party, on the other hand, is in the midst of a struggle between establishment one-nation centrists and self-described democratic socialists. What to do?

I-5 Seattle Mess: Don’t Just Lid It

“The execution of I-5 was a mistake. The challenge before us is to maintain the vital connection I-5 provides, but also heal the damage [on Seattle] its construction inflicted.”

Baby Steps Toward a Regional Approach to Homelessness

The Seattle region has long been, as with Los Angeles, virtually immune to regional governance. Accordingly, these baby steps have been fraught.

At the Grassroots Level, Unlike in DC, Political Reform Is Taking Hold

Steadily growing and idealistically motivated, the movement has the potential of being as important in reforming politics as the Progressive movement was in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Impeach Trump: Thank Joe

If not for Vice President Joe Biden, it would be much quieter these days in our nation’s...

TRENDING

I-5 Seattle Mess: Don’t Just Lid It

“The execution of I-5 was a mistake. The challenge before us is to maintain the vital connection I-5 provides, but also heal the damage [on Seattle] its construction inflicted.”

Model Of Reinvention: Seattle Symphony At A Crossroads

A decade ago the orchestra was badly broken. After ten years of huge progress the SSO is playing better than it ever has and is a model of reinvention. And now another crossroads.

Now Is the Time to Create a New, Third-Way Party

The battle for the soul of the Republican Party has been lost. The Democratic Party, on the other hand, is in the midst of a struggle between establishment one-nation centrists and self-described democratic socialists. What to do?

Impeach Trump: Thank Joe

If not for Vice President Joe Biden, it would be much quieter these days in our nation’s...

Epic Traffic Jam: Exactly Zero Action To Fix I-5’s Looming Crisis

Today not one dollar or one hour at either WSDOT or SDOT is being spent (officially) on large-scale, large-vision planning for the future I-5 transportation function into and through Seattle. It's a crime of neglect.