It was a busy week. Lots to pay attention to.
I continue to be grateful for the work that Ezra Kleinย is doing with his podcast on the IsraelโHamas war as well as the larger issues at the root of the conflict. (Clicking on these links will give you the option of listening to the podcast or reading a transcript of it.)
Early in the week the theme was looking at thisย from the perspective of Hamasย in a podcast titled โThis Is How Hamas Is Seeing This.โ Kleinโs guest was a Palestinian journalist who knows Hamas and its history well. Then on Friday a piece onย โA Path Israel Could Have Taken, And Maybe Still Can.โย That path, ultimately, is the two-state solution. Kleinโs guest insists this is the other viable path toward resolution.
Much discussion in this one of how Netanyahuโs policies and the actions of Israelโs right-wing have contributed to what happened on October 7, as well as how Israel has systematically undermined the Palestinian Authority, leaving the Palestinian people with no viable representation. Plenty of blame to go around. Two very helpful podcasts.
Lots of commentary and kerfuffleย this week about the congressional testimony by Ivy League Presidents regarding anti-semitic words and acts on their campuses.ย Maureen Dowd in a NYTimes piece headlinedย โThe Ivy League Flunks Outโย summed it up as follows:
โWhen Stefanik (Congress member Elise Stefanik) asked Harvardโs president, Claudine Gay, whether calling for the genocide of Jews constituted bullying, Gay said โit could, depending on the context.โ
โI felt the same disgust with the Catholic Church sex scandal, seeing church leaders who were charged with teaching us right from wrong not knowing right from wrong. University presidents should also know right from wrong. As left-wing virulence toward Jews collides with right-wing virulence, these academics not only didnโt show off their brains, they didnโt show their hearts.โ I add this note: being coached by high-priced law firms tends to shrink the heart.
โI think the inability of these individuals to articulate a simple, straightforward answer to what should have been the easiest question in the world was mind-boggling,’โ said Jonathan Greenblatt, the director of the Anti-Defamation League, to Dowd in an interview.
Meanwhile at hisย Weekly Dishย Andrew Sullivan dished on the same topic:
โFreedom of speech in the Ivy League extends exclusively to the voices of the oppressed; they are also permitted to disrupt classes, deplatform or shout down controversial speakers, hurl obscenities, force members of oppressor groups โ i.e. Jewish students and teachers in the latest case โ into lockedย librariesย andย officesย during protests, and blocked fromย classrooms. Jewish students have even been assaulted โ atย Harvard, atย Columbia, atย UMass Amherst, atย Tulane.โ
As I have written here before, framing everything in terms of the oppressor/oppressed binary is a dangerous game to play, now coming back to haunt progressives.
Two parents are a privilege, maybe โtheโ privilege.ย Thereโs a newish book out by Melissa Kearney titledย The Two Parent Privilege.ย Hereโs part of a brief introduction to the book from The Free Press:
โMelissa Kearney is an economist at the University of Maryland and her new book, The Two-Parent Privilege: How Americans Stopped Getting Married and Started Falling Behind, argues that declining marriage rates in Americaโand the corresponding rise in children being raised in single parent householdsโare driving many of the countryโs biggest economic problems. In the 1950s, fewer than 5 percent of babies in this country were born to unmarried mothers. Today, nearly half of all babies in America are born to unmarried mothers.โ
I would add this: โprivilegeโ connotes something unearned and undeserved. Well, yes, babies havenโt exactly โearnedโ two parents. But parents I know who stick with marriage and prioritize their children, put in a lot of effort to make that work. At least most do. That said, I take Kearneyโs point โ every child needs the blessing and benefits of two parents, and whatever our society can do to make that a reality is a very good idea.
A lot of this erosion of marriage, as well as church-going, has taken place in the working class, also ground zero for what have been termed โdeaths of despair.โ There are societal factors at work as the working classes have long been buffeted by many malign forces.
Movie recommendation:

โThe Holdoversโ (now in theaters). With Paul Giamatti and DaโVine Joy Randolph. Kind of a Christmas story, or at least one that takes place at Christmas. Grace happens for and between an unlikelyย group of people. Which is pretty much where grace always happens.
Discover more from Post Alley
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Good piece. That said, I don’t buy the thinly veiled implication that the decline in marriage rates is in some way associated with the decline in church attendance. Primary source scientific references to make that case are lacking. The link between “morality” and religious adherence has been a source of debate. That element should not be overlooked when readers are left with the anecdotal inference that the decline in religious adherence directly leads to a decline in “morality.”