Stranger and Stranger: Behind Seattle’s Only Newspaper’s Endorsements

11

One of the axioms of Seattle politics, possibly an urban legend, is that the most important factor in primary elections is who The Stranger endorses, since a slew of younger, late-deciding readers vote as the paper advises. Political consultants regularly say the Stranger endorsement can boost a candidate by 8-12 points in the low-turnout August primary (much less in the general election).

This week, the website (no longer a print product) issued its lively, highly readable, highly unfair, profanity-laced endorsements. Their mayoral pick, Lorena Gonzalez, the leading progressive in the race, was no surprise, though Jessyn Farrell and Colleen Echohawk had some hopes of an election-shifting nod. 

The paper, in endorsing City Councilwoman Teresa Mosqueda, admitted it had warmed up to this previously dissed candidate as she migrated leftward. Endorsing Nikkita Oliver for the open city council seat continues that romance. Usual favorite City Attorney Pete Holmes got snubbed for an inexperienced challenger on his left, Nichole Thomas-Kennedy. Another leftie new star, Joe Nguyen, got the long-odds pick over fourth-term-seeking County Executive Dow Constantine. More surprisingly, the publication’s endorsements for Seattle School Board (Michelle Sarju and Vivian Maritz) aligned with the consensus, sensible choices.

We will learn after the August 3 primary election how much clout these endorsements still carry. Some think the Stranger is waning. The 30-year-old publication no longer has a print edition, which means glamorous cover photos of the anointed will not be spread all over sidewalks. The paper, struggling before the pandemic, has cut its editorial staff in half and no longer has the reporting credibility that cements reader loyalty. On the other hand, the absence of other rating services, notably the “pause” in evaluations by the Municipal League, means The Stranger, The Seattle Times, and The Urbanist and Publicola pretty much dominate the game. Indeed, the rise of the Stranger’s endorsement clout is directly traceable to the demise of the print Post-Intelligencer, formerly a liberal foil to The Times.

So how does The Stranger do its endorsements, a reader feature that is among the strongest draws? The zany, addictive formula is said to have been created by Dan Savage, one of the paper’s founders and owners. Longtime publisher of the paper (and now just an owner) Tim Keck says the endorsement style was conceived as a kind of “parody” of the stuffy newspaper process, particularly in the joke-laden, snarky, loaded endorsements. Above all, the endorsements are “entertaining,” in hopes of reaching a broad audience of moderately informed voters. Savage once regularly edited the section, adding jokes.

Stranger cover 2017

Candidates are interviewed jointly (not the standard one-on-one), so they can be observed in the boxing ring. The interviews are more of a wrestling match among contestants than the usual sober interview. Some candidates bring placating beer or donuts, and all must be prepared for personal questions (particularly about drug use) and for performing amid heated arguments. One city council candidate recalls showing up and being handed a bottle of whiskey, though such frat-party aspects are now muted. It’s all an effort to throw candidates off their talking points, to cut the crap, see how people think under stress and anger. The paper’s reporters sit in and fire questions (traditional papers protect their beat reporters from such conflicts), and each writer gets an unweighted vote.

Publisher Keck would rarely weigh in to break a tie or make a veto (as he says he did to block a Ralph Nader endorsement), but now he says he avoids the process altogether and all day-to-day involvement in the publication, as does Dan Savage. The endorsements focus on policy and hold firmly to a progressive line or, as the paper’s pitch for donations has it, “journalism that protects the marginalized and holds the powerful accountable.” These endorsement issues are, by one way of looking at them, invaluable marketing to the Stranger base (now 58 percent male and around 40 in median age). Their outrageousness stirs lots of discussion and, more valuably, gives promising newcomers a launch.

The endorsement panel this year was led by associate editor Rich Smith, 35, who joined the paper to review books and arts with a MFA from the University of Washington and now is the main news writer (many bigger names have been raided away or moved on). Others on the panel are writers Charles Mudede, Matt Baume, Jasmyne Keimig, and Natalie Graham. Editor Chase Burns, 29 (also a former arts writer), has another vote, and publisher Laurie Saito says she is abstaining this year. The Stranger staff had been 30 before COVID, with 12 on the editorial side; those numbers today are 13 and 6, according to publisher Saito.

The Stranger, like most newspapers, has endured wrenching changes in recent years. It survived all the cuts, particularly in its mainstay entertainment advertising, thanks to a generous amount of federal PPP money and its new pitch for one-time and monthly contributions, now amounting to 35 percent of revenue. Founder Dan Savage has drifted off to his national eminence and advocacy, and co-founder Tim Keck says he has replaced himself as publisher and as board chair in order to work on a new entertainment package called Everout. 

Stranger Endorsements

The return to print is “very uncertain,” in the words of board chair Rob Crocker, who admits that the print products in Seattle and Portland (Portland Mercury) were “struggling mightily” before the pandemic. Three years ago the papers shifted to fortnightly print frequency, which Crocker says “helped a little.” Web traffic, very dependent on entertainment listings, has dropped 60 percent, he says, and plans for a redesign of the website are under way. As for advertising, publisher Saito says, “our ad base is so wide and varied, we are lucky to be supported by the arts, local politics, retail, non-profits, promoters and the entertainment industries as well.” Pot advertising holds steady at 20 percent of the business.

The Stranger was founded in 1991 by a company called Loaded for Bear, with Keck (co-founder of the humor publication The Onion) joined by James Sturm, Peri Pakroo (Keck’s girlfriend at the time), Nancy Hartunian, Wm. Steven Humphrey, Christine Wenc, Johanna “Jonnie” Wilder, Matt Cook, Andy Spletzer, and, later, Dan Savage. It had a Midwestern sensibility, some thought: vulgar, blunt, funny, naughty, what-the-hell, comic graphics — in all, a great, grating contrast with prissy, middle-class, liberal Seattle. Loaded for Bear took on a financial partner a few years ago, a group called Quarterfold, made up of some former owners of the Chicago Reader. The Chicago group owns 33 percent of the merged company, Index Newspapers. Index is controlled by a board consisting of Keck and Cocker as well as Jane Levine and Tom Yoder, representing Quarterfold owners. Cocker, a former accountant for The Stranger, is the new board chair.

From what I can tell, The Stranger is likely to rebound and survive, thought largely in digital format. The company has diversified into Portland, the ticket business (Stranger Tickets), Dan Savage’s Hump film series (porn, horror, and stoner flicks) licensed to other cities, and Keck’s new venture for entertainment calendae/tickets/restaurant/reader commentary, Everout. The Stranger‘s alternative weekly rival, Seattle Weekly, gave up the ghost last year, and as entertainment returns from the pandemic hibernation, so will the listings and advertising and ticket business to the company.  Portland Mercury, formerly mostly an entertainment publication, has now been doing more news reporting, but it faces a strong rival, Willamette Week.

This year’s Stranger endorsements art – JAMES YAMASAKI

And of course, The Stranger has a lock on progressive politics, a growing audience in Seattle. This year, I learn from talks with Stranger sources, the endorsement discussion did not want to make the same mistake it did four years ago in endorsing Cary Moon for mayor. After the Stranger endorsement, Moon surprisingly shot into second place in the primary, only to be defeated convincingly by business-and-labor-backed Jenny Durkan, whom the paper came to hate for her center-left politics. That Moon episode, said editor Chase Burns, “looms over us,” but it also created the urban legend that as goes the Stranger, so goes the Seattle primary election.

The Moon endorsement became a notorious public squabble for Stranger staffers. The endorsement board split among factions favoring Jessyn Farrell and Nikkita Oliver, so the Moon choice (advocated by her friend Mudede) was a fallback compromise that fizzled. This year, with Oliver safely lateraled over to a city council race, The Stranger could speak in one clear (if predictable) voice on the important mayoral endorsement.

Then it’s on to the donnybrook election in November, where the Stranger writers will be back in the groove of skewering the Seattle establishment candidate. We’ll see if the famous Stranger Boost in the primary will become another Bust in the general.

Previous articleFor the People? Stop Dreaming, Dems and Do Things that Can Get Done
Next articleNew Change Research Poll: Harrell Leads for Mayor, Gonzalez and Echohawk Battle for Second
David Brewster, a founding member of Post Alley, has a long career in publishing, having founded Seattle Weekly, Sasquatch Books, and Crosscut.com. His civic ventures have been Town Hall Seattle and FolioSeattle.

11 COMMENTS

  1. Nicely done and fairly presented. Useful information on how an iconic publication has managed to survive in Seattle. The spinoff of talented writers from the Stranger to other publications is another worthy topic to be covered in the future.

  2. The clock has run out on this publication as without a free print copy they have no market and are just dated. Smoking pot , being gay , and antiestablishment are “mainstream” now and it is tough to compete with the Urbanist or Publicola on line .
    They had a great run (as did the Weekly).

  3. It’s not an urban legend. The Stranger all but determines the left lane candidate in mayoral races. Had they defied expectations this time and endorsed either Jessyn Farrell or Colleen Echohawk, there’s a very good chance that candidate would have leapfrogged Gonzalez and finished second in the primary (behind Harrell). By endorsing Gonzalez they have all but cemented her lock on the left lane ticket out of the primary (though the Echohawk camp believes Colleen is not as far behind Gonzalez as people think and could still pull a surprise upset).

    The most interesting thing about the Stranger’s endorsement of Gonzalez is that, in trying to avoid “the same mistake” they made by endorsing Moon in 2017 (when a divided board elevated a weak candidate running a hapless campaign), it looks to me that in all likelihood they’ve actually repeated the mistake the made in 2013, when they stubbornly stuck by the failed and unpopular incumbent who they’d helped elect in the past.

    Like McGinn in 2013, Gonzalez is running a semi-incumbency campaign, in her case built around defending the performance and policies of the City Council. And like McGinn, she’s running a full bore, unapologetic campaign built around the adversarial style of younger left activist politics.

    Having consulted on the the campaigns of the last two winning mayoral candidates, I fancy I have some insight in to the variables and attributes that shape Seattle’s mayoral races, and imo both of those foundational campaign approaches are strategically foolish, and make Gonzalez a significantly weaker general election candidate against a mod prog, bring people together standard bearer like Bruce Harrell compared to fresh faced prog left outsiders like Jessyn Farrell or Colleen Echohawk.

    So I’m guessing that come November it’ll be evident that the Stranger screwed the pooch for the third time in a row with this endorsement — exactly the fate they were trying to avoid.

  4. I’m not going to pontificate, but tell a story. The Stranger claims virtue, but can be pure as the driven slush.
    In 2016, Stranger ed board voted to endorse Pramila Jayapal in her run for Congress, although staff bigfoot Dan Savage was for Brady Walkinshaw. The Gay-Lesbian Victory Fund launched a hitcampaign on TV claiming (laughably) that Jayapal was ineffective. Dan Savage picked up its talking points for a long anti-Jayapal article in The Stranger.
    Ansel Herz, The Stranger’s cops-public safety reporter, wrote and submitted a piece defending Jayapal. It did not run. Unable to access his own publication, Herz put his article up on Facebook. It was far more effective than the hit piece to which it was responding.
    Herz was let go by The Stranger soon thereafter. He went on to work for Jayapal, and later Sen. Bernie Sanders. Great writers’ publications have a short shelf live, often because of interventions by bigfoot bosses.

  5. There is not one person on the skeleton staff of The Stranger whose opinion I would respect. Since their senior staffers left, the quality of the reporting has plummeted. That the publication still has power shows the gullibility of their demographic.

  6. I’m actually quite surprised that the Stranger didn’t endorse Andrew Grant Houston…he would seem to be the uber-progressive type of candidate they would usually support. Perhaps in the Stranger’s middle-age they have become a little more mainstream (shocking, I know). As noted, Gonzalez does seem to be a “safe” choice while still staying in their lane.

    Maybe some of this change is due to their median reader age of 40, aging hipsters still wanting to feel cool, but not quite as outre as they were in the 20s…hence Gonzalez rather than AGH being the choice.

    Also, you forgot to put the ™ next to Wm. Steven Humphrey’s name (as old-time readers of the Stranger would recall his affectation). 😉

    • A few weeks ago Andrew Grant Houston denounced the Stranger as a bunch of racists, so there’s no love lost there. But he wasn’t going to get their endorsement anyway. They are really concerned about viability, and wanted to pick a left lane mayoral candidate who would have good chance of winning (which AGH does not). But as I wrote in comment above, I think their political viability handicapping is flawed.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.