76 F
Seattle
Friday, July 1, 2022

Why Attack Iran? Likely It’s Trump’s Anti-Obama Obsession

Here’s the real question in terms of Iran:  what is our objective and what is our strategy to achieve that objective? The only answer that makes sense is this is all being driven by Donald Trump’s ambition to be the anti-Obama.

Trump has chosen to put “maximum pressure” on Iran by re-imposing sanctions and now killing their top general.  Why?

The White House says they are not trying to create regime change in Iran, they just want Iran to change its behavior. According to an administration policy paper, “The core objective of President Trump’s Iran Strategy is the systemic change in the Islamic Republic’s hostile and destabilizing actions, including blocking all paths to a nuclear weapon and exporting terrorism.”

OK.  But does anyone really think that killing one general – even one this important – is going to change Iran’s foreign and defense policy?  Soleimani wasn’t a freelance terrorist leader; he was part of the Iranian government, and that government goes on. Would our policies suddenly change if an adversary assassinated our Secretary of Defense?

We don’t want Iran to develop nuclear weapons.  So why unilaterally tear up the Iran nuclear deal which at least paused their nuclear program?  Our own experts said Iran was complying with the deal. Now Iran is restarting its program. Trump’s actions have made a Shia bomb more probable, not less.

And is it credible to believe that Iran is going to stop supporting Shia militias in Yemen, Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, and Iraq?  Extending its influence by helping Shia allies has been at the core of Iran’s foreign policy for decades. And by the way, if checking Iranian influence is so important, why did Trump walk away from Syria and de facto hand it over to Russia and Assad, Iran’s ally?

So maybe our secret desire IS regime change.  That’s certainly what John Bolton and his cadre of hyper-neocons want. That policy at least make sense because the only way you are going to change Iran’s behavior is to replace the political structure of the Islamic Republic with ….what?  A new Shah? An authoritarian secular government on the model of Egypt? Not likely.

Bolton and Pompeo might want regime change, but I believe Donald Trump when he says that is not his objective.  He is, at heart, an isolationist.  

What does Trump want?  It seems that one of his primary motivations is to reverse and erase President Obama’s legacy.  Anything Obama built must be torn down. So, he blows up the Iran nuclear deal, setting off a chain reaction he probably didn’t anticipate and doesn’t welcome.  But The Donald never admits mistakes, so we blunder on towards something like war with no realistic objective or strategy.

This confrontation with Iran has taken on a life of its own.  Iran will make the next move. In a rational world Congress would then to do its job and stop this madness.  But tribal partisanship has overcome rationality. This is all very, very dangerous.

Chris Vance
Chris Vance
Former Washington State Republican lawmaker and State Party Chairman. Republican nominee for the US Senate in 2016. Now an independent.

Post Alley welcomes comments to our articles. Our guidelines: no personal attacks, stay on topic, add something of value to the discussion. Our editors will edit comments for clarity and to conform with our guidelines. We encourage writers to use their full names.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Tragically accurate analysis. We have a leader devoted to tearing down his predecessors — the millions kicked off healthcare, the thousands now headed to endless wars and the irreversible damage to the environment be damned.

  2. One key question: would the Iranians want to punish Trump by tampering with the election, or would they prefer to have such a fool remain the U.S. President? I suspect the latter, which is revenge served cold for the American people.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

LATEST

Time to Lower the Heat in the Post-Roe Commentary

3
If the SCOTUS decision is the beginning, not the end, of the debate, we will need a lot more thoughtful commentary. Here are some examples.

Bolting for the Bigs: USC, UCLA Abandon PAC-12 for Big Ten (UW Next?)

9
It’s official now that the industry has fallen off the edge of the flat Earth propped so long by the mythology of amateurism.

Inside City Hall’s Serious Budget Shortfall

7
The multimillion-dollar gap -- viewed in the perspective of an annual budget in the $7 billion range -- is perhaps not horrific. But it still is bound to impact what the city can achieve towards meeting its on-going needs and ambitious social goals.

Battling Cancer, B.C. Premier Horgan to Step Down

1
Horgan, leader of the New Democratic Party, was a temperamental opposition leader but has proven an avuncular head of government. 

Pot Industry Versus its Workers

2
A new political action committee, People for Legal Cannabis, is gearing up to fight any effort by outsiders such as the UFCW to empower their workers. 

TRENDING

Bolting for the Bigs: USC, UCLA Abandon PAC-12 for Big Ten (UW Next?)

9
It’s official now that the industry has fallen off the edge of the flat Earth propped so long by the mythology of amateurism.

Inside City Hall’s Serious Budget Shortfall

7
The multimillion-dollar gap -- viewed in the perspective of an annual budget in the $7 billion range -- is perhaps not horrific. But it still is bound to impact what the city can achieve towards meeting its on-going needs and ambitious social goals.

Time to Lower the Heat in the Post-Roe Commentary

3
If the SCOTUS decision is the beginning, not the end, of the debate, we will need a lot more thoughtful commentary. Here are some examples.

The Supreme Court: Republican Majorities Since 1970

10
In fact, in every year since 1970, the majority of Supreme Court justices have been Republican appointees. Since the beginning of Chief Justice Warren Burger’s court until the death of Justice Ruth B. Ginsberg, there have been 31 Republican appointed-justices and 8 Democratic appointed-justices sitting on the Supreme Court.The Supreme

The Complicated Legacy of Julia Child

3
The show may be a fictionalized version of Child’s groundbreaking TV success, but it portrays struggles by women for recognition and equality that ring true to that era.