55.1 F
Seattle
Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Exploring the Guns-Race Connection

I’ve often thought of the gun-rights issue as something linked to the hunting culture of a place like Wallowa County. At least one of my grandfathers was a hunter. Like many men (and some women) here he hunted deer and elk in the fall, right near the hunting cabin from which I write this post. The meat was part of the family diet, along with fruit and vegetables canned by my grandmother for winter use. 

In our cabin, the head of a pronghorn antelope is mounted on one wall. On the opposite wall hangs the tanned skin of a brown bear.

But if the Harvard historian Jill Lepore is correct, the modern gun-rights movement, championed by the National Rifle Association, has a lot more to do with race and racism than it does with hunting.

Lepore notes that the second amendment — “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” — received almost no attention for two centuries. That changed in the 1960s when people like Malcolm X and others in Black Power movements pointed out that blacks too had a constitutional right to own guns and encouraged blacks to arm themselves. You may recall the photos of gun toting Black Panthers of that era. 

In the South, the issue predates the 60s Black Power movement. After the Civil War, black veterans who had fought for the Union came home with guns. That was part of what triggered terrorist groups like the KKK. They took it upon themselves to see that African-Americans were disarmed. In the South, guns were for white people. 

In her massive one-volume history of the U.S., These Truths, Lepore provocatively terms the gun-rights movement that got under way in the late 60s and 70s, “A rights fight for white men.” So it’s no wonder that gun rights, racism, white nationalism, and issues of masculinity continue to swirl together in a toxic brew. 

A second driving force of the gun-rights movement, according to Lepore, was the rise of the anti-immigrant movement, a reaction to the liberalization of U.S. immigration laws in 1965. Previous immigration laws had favored people who were white. Here’s Lepore:

“Part of the backlash against both feminism and civil rights, gun rights became a conservative political movement, a rights fight for white men.”

“If, in the 1960s, the gun debate took place in the shadow of the Black Power movement, in the 1970s it took place in the shadow of a growing White Power movement. A whitelash that began as a reaction against the civil rights movement in the 1960s gained strength i the 1970s and 1980s as a reaction to changing patterns of immigration.”

“The gun rights movement was tightly bound to anti-immigrant animus. The NRA turned itself from a sporting and hunting association into a powerful political interest group during the very years that hostility against immigration was on the rise.”

Again, if Lepore is right, guns, white power, racism, sexism, and anti-immigration sentiments have been bound up together since the get-go of the gun-rights movement. So the El Paso mass shooting two weeks ago, where the shooter set out to “kill Mexicans,” has a long and tortured pre-history. It has been a not-so-stealth movement of white men, wrapped up in specious claims about the Constitution.

Still, we ought to be cautious about oversimplification of a complex issue. Attributing all gun violence to racism provides a reductive, simplistic explanation of a complex,multi-cause reality. It is one significant factor, but the overall problem is more complex. Conservatives, including Trump, also look for one explanation for mass murders with guns. Their favorite is “mental illness.” I suspect that Lepore is right in arguing that racism has a lot more to do with gun violence than “mental illness.”

Outside the NRA’s headquarters stand these words: “The rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Note that this part of the second amendment has been shorn of the previous clause and context about a well-regulated militia, that is something like the National Guard. 

Understanding this history and the gun-rights movement as being, at least in significant part, a “rights fight for white men,” would go a long way toward explaining why so little progress has been made on gun safety or getting serious about reducing these outrageous mass shootings. It is about a whole lot more than hunting elk. 

Photo by Heather Mount on Unsplash

Anthony B. Robinson
Anthony B. Robinsonhttps://www.anthonybrobinson.com/
Tony is an ordained minister of the United Church of Christ. He is the author of thirteen books, including the best-selling Transforming Congregational Culture and the award-winning What’s Theology Got To Do With It: Convictions, Vitality and the Church. He is a frequent contributor to The Christian Century as well as other publications. He writes for the “The Daily Devotional” of the United Church of Christ. He has served four congregations, most recently Seattle’s Plymouth Congregational Church, UCC.

1 COMMENT

  1. I think this article does what is popular. Wrap a complex problem in racism and in this case throw in sexism. This tactic promotes division with the simple meme gun owners/racist/bad, against the good people who refuse discussion with the ignorant. The people on both ends of the spectrum shout each other down and…well,you already know.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

LATEST

Books: A New Classic of Northwest Logging and Radicalism

If Norwegians and Swedes laid down the legends of the Puget Sound country, Finns were their counterparts in southwest Washington and northwest Oregon in lands drained by the mighty Columbia.

Seattle Elections: Has the “Movement Left” Reached Its Half-Life?

Interest groups have a half-life of about 30 years in the fluid, non-partisan world of Seattle politics.

Democrats’ Debate: Let a Little Sunshine In

The best thing you can say about Julian Castro’s taunting of Joe Biden about “forgetting what he...

The Great Realignment: Are You Ready For America’s Seventh Version Of Political Parties?

We live in historic times. Our system is being realigned as a seventh party system firms up. Republicans have chosen long term political suicide by alienating everyone other than their increasingly narrow base. The door is open for the Democrats.

Dem Debate: A House Divided?

With so many threats to American security and democracy that every one of the 10 candidates was able to plant his or her flag on a vital issue.

TRENDING

Seattle Elections: Has the “Movement Left” Reached Its Half-Life?

Interest groups have a half-life of about 30 years in the fluid, non-partisan world of Seattle politics.

Books: A New Classic of Northwest Logging and Radicalism

If Norwegians and Swedes laid down the legends of the Puget Sound country, Finns were their counterparts in southwest Washington and northwest Oregon in lands drained by the mighty Columbia.

Dynamic Duo: When Maggie And Scoop Made The Senate Work For Us

Jackson and Magnuson each established a formidable legislative record. When it came to getting bills passed in Congress, these senators would put today’s Congress to shame.

The Great Realignment: Are You Ready For America’s Seventh Version Of Political Parties?

We live in historic times. Our system is being realigned as a seventh party system firms up. Republicans have chosen long term political suicide by alienating everyone other than their increasingly narrow base. The door is open for the Democrats.

Blown away by an unfiltered Mayor Pete

Simple outcome. I was blown away. Twenty minutes of house party stump speech was even better than I had any reason to guess I would come away with. Answers to questions were even better.