41.7 F
Seattle
Tuesday, December 10, 2019

How to make political change digestible

Several anti-Trump moderate-to-conservatives followed up on the Democratic Party Debates last month by worrying that the Democrats had let themselves be pushed too far to the left in their first big turn in the national spotlight.

One was David Brooks who pleaded with Democrats to give him someone who he could vote for. Meaning, of course, not just him but those like him who deplore Trump but aren’t left-wing progressives. Another was Bret Stephens, who declared the debates a “wretched start” for the Democratic Party. Here’s a bit from Stephens:

“In this week’s Democratic debates, it wasn’t just individual candidates who presented themselves to the public. It was also the party itself. What conclusions should ordinary people draw about what Democrats stand for, other than a thunderous repudiation of Donald Trump, and how they see America, other than as a land of unscrupulous profiteers and hapless victims? Here’s what: a party that makes too many Americans feel like strangers in their own country. A party that puts more of its faith, and invests most of its efforts, in them instead of us.”

I do remember thinking “uh-oh” when Kamala Harris joined Bernie in raising her hand indicating she would eliminate private health insurance. (She has since “clarified” that position.) But my thought at the time was, “Listen, for better or worse, most Americans aren’t willing to entrust health care completely to the government. Just not happening.” The night before Warren and De Blasio had taken the same pledge.

It made me think of something I learned the hard way as a church pastor. I called it, “Change by Addition Not Subtraction.”

It goes like this — Say there is a church program or ministry that had once had its day and now is moribund or running on fumes. So you announce we’re dropping this or cancelling that. Suddenly, people came out of the woods to support the threatened program. Instead of eliminating something, you add something that more effectively addresses current realities in that area and after it is up and running then you let the old thing go without much push-back, if any. Change by Addition not Subtraction.

I think of this on health care. I’m not sure that we will ever decide in this country to totally eliminate private health care coverage, but if we are going to move toward more of a public option we will stand a better chance of getting there by adding (as Obamacare did) and not eliminating, or threatening to eliminate, all non-public options.

Besides that, the “Medicare for All” cry seems to be based on the idea that Medicare is just hunky-dory and everyone is super happy with it. That’s not my experience. Medicare doesn’t cover lots of things and cuts off payment when they think a patient has had enough treatment, not necessarily when a doctor or patient think that. Medicare seems to me to function more as a major medical problem coverage plan, which is important but not health-care nirvana by a long shot.

Another issue on which Democrats at the debates were crying “Left-ward Ho!” as rapidly as they could was immigration. There are lots of people who deplore Trump’s family-separation cruelties and don’t support a wall, but who aren’t for open borders. Yet nearly-open borders is pretty much where Julian Castro and others seemed to be driving the party. “De-criminalize” illegal entry. “Provide health care coverage” immediately to all immigrants regardless of legal status.

Again, there may be some idealistic, even practical, rational for such positions, but the majority of Americans aren’t going there. Democrats who insist on driving the bus that far to the left are ensuring Trump a second-term.

There is something about current versions of progressivism that is sanctimonious. Moreover, there is an aversion to incremental change and compromise is anathema. But, listen, politics is the realm of proximate not ultimate solutions. It is the realm of compromise.

Making progress, taking steps in a sound direction is so much more likely to succeed than declaring that everyone who doesn’t assume the most correct (that is, “our”) position is a moral cretin. Alas, there is such moral certainty in the echo-chamber of progressivism that it sometimes seems being correct is more important attaining a governing coalition.

This election is really about getting power not perfection.

I am undecided about Biden, but I do wish that when Congressman Eric Swalwell began to light into him about “passing the torch,” that Biden might of said, “Listen, buddy, you can’t pass the torch if you don’t have it.”

Graphic from Pixabay

Anthony B. Robinson
Anthony B. Robinsonhttps://www.anthonybrobinson.com/
Tony is an ordained minister of the United Church of Christ. He is the author of thirteen books, including the best-selling Transforming Congregational Culture and the award-winning What’s Theology Got To Do With It: Convictions, Vitality and the Church. He is a frequent contributor to The Christian Century as well as other publications. He writes for the “The Daily Devotional” of the United Church of Christ. He has served four congregations, most recently Seattle’s Plymouth Congregational Church, UCC.

1 COMMENT

  1. I don’t disagree with you that there is a rising tide of moralized, manichean sanctimony on the left, but don’t you think there is even more “moral certainty in the echo chamber” of conservatism, and that the left is polarizing in response to the provocations from the right?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

LATEST

Seattle Scar: I-5 Ripped A Hole Through The City – An Anonymous Author Offers An Audacious Fix

What if we were to lid the downtown I-5? Or put all its traffic into new tunnels to the east? Or get rid of it entirely? Big visions, but also big questions.

Model Of Reinvention: Seattle Symphony At A Crossroads

A decade ago the orchestra was badly broken. After ten years of huge progress the SSO is playing better than it ever has and is a model of reinvention. And now another crossroads.

Impeaching Trump: Is That All There Is?

Is it wise to put the whole case in this one Ukraine basket? This scandal seems to have moved that meter only marginally. Trump's earlier potential crimes and misdemeanors, if less serious, may be easier to understand.

Indexer: King County Migration – Why We’re Getting More Millennial

The rapid hiring by Amazon explains a good deal of the Millennial bulge. At the other end of the age spectrum, few older people migrate to a place like King County, and some older people will migrate out to warmer, quieter, less expensive places.

Indexer: Taking Over – Millennials Everywhere?

In dynamic West Coast cities, attracting young people from around the country does not seem to be a problem. Whether they choose to stay and build their lives in these cities is another question, and is tied closely to the price of housing and the lengths of commutes.

TRENDING

Model Of Reinvention: Seattle Symphony At A Crossroads

A decade ago the orchestra was badly broken. After ten years of huge progress the SSO is playing better than it ever has and is a model of reinvention. And now another crossroads.

Is Seattle Courting Over-Tourism?

When cities invest in the visitor market (hotels, convention centers, festivals) they are ordinarily playing a final, desperate card in economic development.

Seattle Scar: I-5 Ripped A Hole Through The City – An Anonymous Author Offers...

What if we were to lid the downtown I-5? Or put all its traffic into new tunnels to the east? Or get rid of it entirely? Big visions, but also big questions.

Impeaching Trump: Is That All There Is?

Is it wise to put the whole case in this one Ukraine basket? This scandal seems to have moved that meter only marginally. Trump's earlier potential crimes and misdemeanors, if less serious, may be easier to understand.

Circle Of Life: Climate Change And Its Impacts On Northwest Animals

Forecasts for the Columbia Basin aren’t encouraging. Over the coming century, “a lot of the lower Columbia will become unsuitable” for salmon, one expert says.