Where we Are: The Politics of Coercion and Retribution

-

With a sharply divided country, and an unwinnable Vietnam War, 1968 presidential candidate Richard Nixon seized on a sign held up by an Ohio high school student. Her message: “Bring us together again.”

Of course, the private and paranoid Nixon would tell aides: “Nobody is our friend.” But the kid’s message spoke to the endurance and resilience of America. We could fight it out at the ballot box, on the floor in Congress, but compromise and the rule of law kept the Republic on even keel.

Donald Trump has trashed all that. We have a vengeance-driven, 79-year-old president bent on putting salt in social wounds rather than finding common purpose. The voices of dissent, exercising First Amendment rights, he dismisses as “far left lunatics.” Whenever anything goes wrong — even a teleprompter malfunction — “enemies” get blamed.

Some years back, following the “Prague Spring,” I visited the Czech Republic. Our host had been arrested a year earlier when communist rulers deployed troops to suppress, of all things, a celebration of John Lennon’s birthday, a demonstration against oppression, keyed to a famous lyric, “Give peace a chance.”

It could never happen in America, we assured each other. Yet, last week, 44 minutes into a 73-minute stemwinder, our president talked about instructing the Secretary of Defense— pardon, Secretary of War — “I told Pete we should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military.” Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, Portland, maybe Seattle — vibrant cities with productive multiethnic populations have been signaled out, demonized as “hellholes, “out of control,” and “ruined.” 

Our military has by tradition kept aloof from politics. In 2020, JCS Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, Defense Secretary Mark Esper and our Rep. Adam Smith pushed back, resisting Trump’s urge to deploy American troops against American citizens. No more. The high ranks of government are today staffed by Trump toadies. The POTUS’s initial acts included sacking the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. A four-star Army general, Secretary of Defense in the last administration, was replaced by a weekend Fox News talk show host.

We used to watch World War II movies of evil Gestapo agents snatching people off streets, even violating the confessional in Catholic Churches. Yet, within the past week, masked ICEmen in an unmarked vehicle picked up an “illegal” outside Horizon House on First Hill. Longtime U.S. residents, who arrived here as toddlers, are being shipped off to countries where they have never lived.

The first American-born pontiff, Pope Leo XIV, has been moved to decry “the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States” and appeal that “we respect one another.” Trump’s first-term Secretary of Defense, Gen. James Mattis of Richland, Wash, warned: “We must reject any thinking of our cities as a ‘battlefield’ that our uniformed military is called upon to ‘dominate.’”

Early in this decade, a compromising Congress managed to “get (bleep) done” on two fronts. The Infrastructure bill would repair our roads, and upgrade rail lines and airports. The Inflation Reduction Act made — at last — significant investment in clean energy technology. Trump is now using the government to put progress in reverse and punish the 26 states that voted for Kamala Harris last year. He’s blunt about it, saying: “We can cut a lot of things we didn’t want, and they are Democrats’ things.”

The early result is that New York loses $8 billion in transportation projects. The administration has pulled back another $8 billion in clean energy spending, affecting 321 awards for 223 projects — which were programs approved by the Congress.

The U.S. Department of Energy is canceling $1 billion in federal money designed to jump start a green hydrogen hub in the Northwest. Russel Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, boasts about rejection of new technology, crowing: “Nearly $8 billion in Green New Scam funding to fuel the Left’s climate agenda is being canceled.”

Climate change is neither agenda nor scam. It is reality. Weather extremes are doing billions worth of damage. Hotter climate is triggering enormous wildfires, droughts, human migration, and melting polar ice caps — and Trump calls it a “hoax.”

The president’s purpose is to divide. Using social media, he dispenses invective, ridicule, and mockery. He bullies, for example, threatening to pull World Cup soccer matches out of cities he doesn’t like. Or lavishes money on a new White House ballroom while starving the National Park Service.

The United States, united and motivated, is unstoppable. We have bested Soviet Communism and National Socialism, led the world in technology innovation, and served as a beacon of liberty. The keys to America’s greatness have included division of powers, orderly change of government, the rule of law, and an ever-more-inclusive society. Now, a would-be Caudillo — a bossman— would take all that away. Walt Whitman put it best: Resist much, obey little.

This article also appears in Cascadia Advocate.


Discover more from Post Alley

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Open an AI Critique of this story
Joel Connelly
Joel Connelly
I worked for Seattle Post-Intelligencer from 1973 until it ceased print publication in 2009, and SeattlePI.com from 2009 to 6/30/2020. During that time, I wrote about 9 presidential races, 11 Canadian and British Columbia elections‎, four doomed WPPSS nuclear plants, six Washington wilderness battles, creation of two national Monuments (Hanford Reach and San Juan Islands), a 104 million acre Alaska Lands Act, plus the Columbia Gorge National Scenic Area.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Joel Connelly’s anguish and pain are again on emotive display from his deft hand. Sympathies. Catalogues of Trump/Maga madness are familiar and are added daily. None of this gets us anywhere except to share the anguish that we all experience and know all to well.
    There is a “feel better” quality to even high quality rants, but they also feed the beast. Trump and Trumpers would endorse our disquiet, anger and frustration. They are signs that they succeed in our running around in powerless circles.
    Are there alternatives.
    1.The daily Trump journalism show when the President is handed the national microphone needs to be reworked and rethought. Journalism and journalists need to find language that spells out “that is not true” . “That is a lie” Questions need to be asked in the form of pointing out what nonsense the President has proclaimed, not quoting the President benignly, and then not asking for a comment; but rather pointing out that what the President said or wrote was false (add facts) and then let the President speak. Make him furious by challenging him with truth and stand your ground when he attacks. Be prepared to argue with the President. Yes, risk being thrown out of the “news” conference that has become the Presidential platform abetted by a “free” press.
    2.Journalism: and journalists: You are dealing with a thin-skinned bully who insults you, demeans you, and in the end owns you.
    2. Easy for me to say. You bet, but those”covering” the Administration are enabling the President and his appointed followers when the task is to do more than politely ask questions and report or broadcast the result without comment. Yes there is plenty of next day push back. It accomplishes nothing. There is all-too-small traditional responsible journalism that tries to be fair. Can’t be done. Fairness is based on two sides playing fair. At this point when the President calls the journalist corps to order, he is being given free rein. To quote the President: “This is war”.
    3. Has the press corpsr ever considered staying silent, not asking questions? Sure the Trump press would throw softballs and the President would be in his element. But then walk out, report the result and do not give the man air time. If he does announce anything of substance, report the substance, but not in dialogue form, Treat the President as a handout.
    4. The networks and others may demand that their reporters and cameras stay.
    Be prepared to quit. Any journalist trying to ply the craft as it was meant to be practiced has a choice. Yes you may need the job, but it is not a job if you are asked to violate your standards, ethics, and thereby go against….oh-my-god:PRINCIPLES.

    • Bravo! Or, as we used to say, right on! It’s absolutely ridiculous and shameful that at this stage of the game the news media covering Trump are basically nothing more than enablers.

    • Amen!

      In my opinion, the press has been too coy to argue in the interest of “fairness” and afraid of being tossed out of the press conferences so they can gather headlines and only somewhere hidden in their reporting, report the lies and nonsense spewed by this idiot.

      Your comments are apt and hoping that your four alternatives are taken to heart by any journalist willing to take the time to read them.

Leave a Reply to Pheeson Liaw Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments Policy

Please be respectful. No personal attacks. Your comment should add something to the topic discussion or it will not be published. All comments are reviewed before being published. Comments are the opinions of their contributors and not those of Post alley or its editors.

Popular

Recent