Stuck in Time: America’s Old Foreign Policies are a Trap for Biden


A recent column in Politico, “Why the World is Voting Against American Democracy,” noted the way foreign policy and foreign countries may influence America’s presidential campaign. It quoted an unnamed European ambassador: “The U.S. is ‘a fat buffalo trying to take a nap as hungry wolves approach,’ the envoy mused. ‘I can hear those Champagne bottle corks popping in Moscow — like it’s Christmas every fucking day.'”

As the ambassador feared, Biden’s liberal world order is on the ballot in America, and the incumbent President and his dated policies may be too old to win big games/wars. Many countries are rooting against the Pax Americana, which means Iran, China, and Russia will be the big covert players in the 2024 presidential race.

The first vulnerability of Biden will be the potent political charge that “he lost Ukraine.” Republicans now hold hostage votes to aid Ukraine as a way to promote southern border policies and to shift the blame for reneging on Ukraine to Biden’s stubbornness or obtuseness about migration. That strategy is bound to carry through to the election, coupled with the charge of initiating wars America can’t win. Russia will be pleased.

A second vulnerability is a Carter-like hostage situation in Gaza. This is another pressure-point that is bound to have longevity. Iran is an old hand at using the hostage issue as a way of retiring a hostile U.S. president, as happened with Jimmy Carter in 1980. Whether Iran would welcome the return of a hostile Donald Trump is questionable, but weakening the American order is high on Tehran’s list. Iran will be pleased and able through proxies to keep the hostage issue in headlines.

The third vulnerability and opportunity is saber-rattling by China over Taiwan. With America already stretched thin by two other proxy wars, China has maximum leverage to surround Taiwan with military bases and the Chinese Navy. Biden may be tempted to roll back some of the tariff and other trade constraints to quiet the rattling sabers, in turn raising the “soft on China” issue for Republicans. China will be pleased at this weakening of America’s hand and certainly perceive the advantages of a Trump restoration.

 A fourth vulnerability will be the anti-war/young-voter constituency, stirred up by the war in Gaza. Just as the Vietnam War destroyed the chances for a coalition of New Democrats and Cold War Liberals, so this split of the left over foreign policy will weaken Biden’s electoral chances. Ukraine, Gaza, Taiwan, the revival of the anti-war Left — it’s not a pretty quad-fecta, nor one that will avoid continuous headlines.

These factors put on the table the issue of the old age of Biden and the Cold War Liberalism that he has long espoused. One might argue, for instance, that Biden should have been more careful about commitments to a very vulnerable Ukraine, not rushing into another protracted war like Vietnam. And one might further argue, along these revisionist lines, that Biden’s Irish penchant for loyalty to allies like Israel needed instead a stronger component of American peace-making neutrality and conciliation among Arab countries and Israel. 

The fading of Cold War Liberalism is the subject of a new book by Yale historian Samuel Moyn, Liberalism Against Itself.  Moyn argues that Cold War liberalism was so obsessed by totalitarian fears (German and Russia) that it scuttled the Enlightenment beliefs in broad, state-led reform. Instead of being true to these traditional liberal ideas, the cold war liberals narrowed a robust liberalism into emancipatory and identitarian liberalism that avoided broader social needs. “Yet this last-ditch defense appeared at a time when liberals around the world were building the most ambitious and interventionist and largest — as well as the most egalitarian and redistributive — liberal states that had ever existed,” Moyn argues. 

In short, Biden will be put off balance by his age but also by the advanced age of the liberal consensus on American-led foreign policy. In turn, those policies have become the frozen pond of a dated liberal consensus and Biden’s too-close advisers. That vulnerable consensus was formed in the urgency of the Cold War, when collective policies all seemed like the road to serfdom.

Can Biden shift in time to save his presidency, for instance by a reset on its Israel policy? A little less of the superpower mode and more of the pluralist policy for a multi-power world? Or will voters instead vote to toss out all those alliances in a Trumpian, isolationist, no-new-wars rampage?

David Brewster
David Brewster
David Brewster, a founding member of Post Alley, has a long career in publishing, having founded Seattle Weekly, Sasquatch Books, and His civic ventures have been Town Hall Seattle and FolioSeattle.


  1. Stumped by some of the terminology here, I turned to wikipedia. Liberal consensus: “The postwar liberal consensus included acceptance of a modest welfare state and anti-communism domestic and foreign policies. Some of its elements were shared with embedded liberalism, that aimed to combine benefits of free markets with some interventionist domestic policies. ”

    That may be where Biden’s coming from, but what I read in the article here seems at most marginally related. Every state recognizes allies and enemies and to some extent that informs policy. I find it hard to imagine that anyone in the US doesn’t recognize Russia and China as enemies (even when they knowingly serve their interests.) Israel has been an ally, for various reasons that don’t seem driven by some liberal ideology; Taiwan and the Ukraine for simpler reasons.

    Clearly many voters in the US see little value in statesmanship and have little interest in any world order. Among the many things they don’t value. I’m not aware of any meaningful alternative on the table, it seems to be Biden’s agenda vs. what may be charitably denoted as isolationism. Is there another direction for responsible statesmanship? If so, what?

    • Good question.

      Hint is in the number of responses.

      on Brewster ‘s post here (today) — 2 , including mine — on global politics …….
      and then Thiel’s on football (yesterday) — 17.

      2 to 17.

      That says a lot and it’s not that Brewster is not as good at writer as Thiel.

      The numbers are pretty sobering.

    • As the (still) most powerful nation in the world, the US has a responsibility to help out neighbors and allies in trouble; it’s the Spider-Man truism, “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility”. However, MAGA voters think illegal immigration is a bigger security threat than Russia, China and/or Iran, and non-MAGAs are so stressed about their stagnant incomes not being enough to get housing, outpace inflation, etc., that they can’t be bothered with international issues.

      Now if the US sends its military into active duty in Ukraine, Gaza or the South China Sea, or if we (God forbid) get attacked, it’s a different story.

  2. There is no reason for the United States to give any aid to Israel at this point.
    It would be inexcusable for Biden to support Netanyahu as he’s a mad man with nothing but revenge as his future.

  3. David’s column makes several points, the est of which is:
    “Just as the Vietnam War destroyed the chances for a coalition of New Democrats and Cold War Liberals, so this split of the left over foreign policy will weaken Biden’s electoral chances.”
    My Democrat party started disappearing before my eyes as I watched RFK’s assassination, and the Chicago riots at the 1968 Convention. Well summarized in the book, “Where have all the Democrats gone?” by John Judis.
    The answer is “blowing in the wind.”
    I will vote for Biden but God I hope he steps aside before the Convention.
    If you want to know how bad it will be, watch Trump’s inaugural address on You Tube and think like the narcissist he is.

  4. This weighs me down like a load of bricks, but is a very important commentary. Israel be cut off from our support I suppose, and Europe made responsible for Europe. Barbara de la Cuesta, (your East Coast suscriber who likes national commentary)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments Policy

Please be respectful. No personal attacks. Your comment should add something to the topic discussion or it will not be published. All comments are reviewed before being published. Comments are the opinions of their contributors and not those of Post alley or its editors.