Three Reasons Public Confidence in the Supreme Court has Plunged


As Americans’ trust in their country’s institutions has fallen, from government to religion to the media, one institution where approval held up was the U.S. Supreme Court.  A 2020 Gallup Poll taken about the time when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, registered a 58 percent favorable rating.

No more. A Gallup survey late last year showed the Court’s approval rating down to 40 percent, with disapproval up to 53 percent.  A Marquette University poll likewise showed a 20 percent falloff, down to 44 percent.

A politicized, right leaning Court has forfeited credibility.  Just look at its rulings.  The justices have eviscerated the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The 2010 Citizens United ruling nixed a century of effort, begun under Theodore Roosevelt to control campaign spending. The Thursday decision on the right to carry concealed weapons countermanded a New York law long on the books.

“It is, frankly, hard not to feel betrayed:  The traditions that limit the power of judges to make law (out of) whole cloth include, first and fundamentally, respect for precedent,” wrote University of Southern California law professor Susan Estrich, after Justice Alito’s draft opinion rolling back Roe v. Wade leaked to the press.

Presidents used to pick Supreme Court nominees without an agenda or interest group blessing.  Two picks by President Eisenhower, Earl Warren and William Brennan, were outspoken progressives.  The first choice of President Kennedy, Byron “Whizzer” White, was a conservative and one of the two dissenters on Roe v. Wade.  A trio of Republican appointees defined abortion rights in the Webster opinion.

The Court’s loss of credibility is rooted in three factors.  The first is a heavy hand of politicizing.  In a deal with the devil, the Christian right accommodated multiple character flaws of Donald Trump in exchange for selection of three Justices who’ve overturned Roe v. Wade.  The Court has turned its back on stare decisis, and is blurring the distinction of church and state.

The second factor, dishonesty in the confirmation process.  Two justices, Thomas and Kavanaugh, have faced credible allegations of sexual harassment and assault: In both cases, the Senate Judiciary Committee has sent nominations to the Senate floor without hearing witnesses and vetting the evidence.

During confirmation, Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch agreed in public and private that Roe v. Wade was settled law. In Kavanaugh’s words, cited Friday by Sens. Collins and Manchin: “Roe is 45 years old, it has been reaffirmed many times, lots of people care about it a great deal, and I’ve tried to demonstrate I understand real-world consequences. I am a don’t-rock-the-boat kind of judge.”

“Both (Kavanaugh and Gorsuch) were insistent on the importance of supporting longstanding precedents that the country has relied upon,” Sen. Collins said in a statement. 

The third factor, political manipulation.  Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused, for nearly a year, even to hold a hearing on President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace the deceased Nino Scalia.  When Ginsburg died, in the middle of the 2020 election, Senate Republicans rushed through the nomination of Judge Amy Comey Barrett in just over a month.

In Collins’ words, the result has been “a sullen and radical jolt to the country that will lead to political chaos, anger and a further loss of confidence in our government.”  Or words of Sen. Manchin, the lone Democratic vote to confirm Kavanaugh, “I trusted Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh when they testified under oath that they also believed Roe v. Wade was settled legal precedent and I am alarmed they chose to reject the stability the ruling has provided for two generations of Americans.”

The Court’s loss of credibility is harmful to the nation.  Polling by Gallup suggests that those saying they have “a great deal or a fair amount of confidence” in the federal judiciary have fallen from 67 percent in 2020 to 54 percent.”

Shortly before her death, Justice Ginsburg spoke of what has been lost. “My hope is we will get back to the way it once was, that kind of collegiality, good relationships, people who liked and respected each other even though they disagreed on some important questions.”

It is hard to like or respect this Court.

Joel Connelly
Joel Connelly
I worked for Seattle Post-Intelligencer from 1973 until it ceased print publication in 2009, and from 2009 to 6/30/2020. During that time, I wrote about 9 presidential races, 11 Canadian and British Columbia elections‎, four doomed WPPSS nuclear plants, six Washington wilderness battles, creation of two national Monuments (Hanford Reach and San Juan Islands), a 104 million acre Alaska Lands Act, plus the Columbia Gorge National Scenic Area.


  1. Maybe the Senate Judiciary Committee should have investigated the integrity of the witnesses more throughly in the Kavanaugh investigation, they might have found out the role of that senior senator from California . Remembering the Thomas hearings, he would never have been appointed if it weren’t for Biden’s forceful influence .

  2. The Supremecourt manipulations along with redistricting resulting in lower courts and local elections gradually migrating towards Radical/Conservative rule are results of a clear strategy to achieve permanent minority power over a disagreeing majority of voters. It started, explicitly, with formation of “the tea party”. It is unfortunate that the Democratic Party are so late (too late?) in catching on to what’s been going on in front of us for decades.

      • I think the majority of voters aren’t as obsessed with this point as you are. It’s a medical decision, period.


        The majority of abortions occur in the 1st trimester, about 1in 9. Those occurring later are much fewer and have a direct connection to lack of local reproductive health services available in some areas of the country, and with poverty. Also, having to deal with a health insurance company to pre-approve the claim can delay health care. Later abortions are to save a woman’s life, or because the fetus is non-viable.
        A court decision made on the basis of religious belief rather than science and facts does delegitimize the court.

        A court with a member shuffled in during an election, to appease the former guy, while McConnell denied a court appointment for months to our only Black President, was the end of any possible legitimacy for this court. McConnell is responsible for the death of the court. That will be his legacy.
        American citizens do not have a supreme court, a deliberative body making decisions on the laws of the country. We have a religious tribunal that does not, cannot, and will not serve a democratic republic based on the rule of law. National laws are now nothing more than capricious thoughts written down.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments Policy

Please be respectful. No personal attacks. Your comment should add something to the topic discussion or it will not be published. All comments are reviewed before being published. Comments are the opinions of their contributors and not those of Post alley or its editors.